Good afternoon everyone!
If you’re up to date with current events or ever look at
Facebook’s trending section in the right hand corner of your screen, you will
have noticed that a major decision has been made by the Supreme Court here in
the United States.
Here is the down-low, in case you’re wondering.
The Supreme Court has agreed to determine whether laws
regarding same-sex marriages should be a state-issue or a nation-issue. The constitution
is national law, so if the Supreme Court rules that the constitution does not
object to same-sex marriages or encourages freedom within these parameters, and
that state laws that prohibit it infringes upon these rights as an American,
than the Supreme Court will rule that states can no longer make laws regarding
same-sex marriages. In fact, it will make same-sex-marriage a constitutional
right. Conversely, if the opposite is found to be true, states will hold onto
their right to make laws accordingly.
I encourage each individual to research this for the best
understanding, but that is the simple explanation.
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court’s decision will most definitely
not be simple.
Here is the main reason. Advocates of same-sex marriage pull
from the argument that one’s sexual preference is a part of their identity as a
human—a free human/citizen of the USA. Therefore, making laws against ones
identity is wrong. This argument sounds fair enough.
GLAAD, an LGBT advocacy organization, and its CEO/President
Sarah Kate Ellis demands that state laws prohibiting same-sex marriages are
unfair because everyone should have the ability to “protect and care for the
person [they] love”. She also cites that conflicting states laws on the matter
are indignant and confusing.
There is a bigger picture here, though.
The question people should be asking themselves is if the
government, state or country, should be making any laws regarding marriage at
all.
To quote Jim Daly, “regardless of the outcome [of the
Supreme Court’s decision], today’s news fails to recognize, appreciate and
honor a key truth. Marriage is an institution that historically and culturally
has always brought the two unique and complementary parts of humanity together
into a lifetime, cooperative partnership that establishes and maintains the
family.” He goes onto say that marriage shouldn’t be something that laws should
be made out. You can read the full article here.
While I partially agree with this post, Daly fails to
realize that by inferring that laws shouldn’t be made about marriage because it’s
a moral issue offers more problems than solutions.
America was founded on the idea of morals. What is right and what is wrong. Our constitution was written based on these morals.
But… what actually is right and wrong?
In today’s society, what defines right and wrong is personal
preference. I.e., if this feels right, it must be right for me. As long as I’m
not hurting anyone, I’m good.
Right?
Wrong.
Besides the fact that this type of argument doesn’t take
into account that personal decision also affect ones self—often more profoundly
than they do anyone else—it fails to realize that feelings are weak
justifications for actions.
I feel like eating a whole pizza. I’m not hurting anyone; but
my body suffers regardless.
Racists feel superiority to other races. They act
accordingly. In the time of the Civil War, a black person wasn’t even
considered to be a full human. Why? Because white people felt themselves
superior.
Advocates of same-sex marriage feel that what they’re doing
or supporting is right and based on their American citizenship, the rights it divvies,
and in the name of freedom and love that these feelings should be legally
protected.
In all truth, though, most analogies are weak arguments.
The fact of the matter is that moral standards exist whether
we believe them to be relative of objective. But if relativism is true (which is
what same-sex marriages propose), than no one could critique one another for
anything. Period.
Yet, it remains that we still do.
Furthermore, if there is no moral standard, than there is no
such thing as moral progress. How ironic it is to claim, then, that legally guaranteeing
approved same-sex marriages would be moral progress. It actually wouldn’t
even matter.
“[If] there are no fixed moral standards… [accordingly] all
moral change is equal, neither objectively good nor bad. So when slavery was
abolished in America, this was not moral progress. Nor did we morally progress
when women were granted the right to vote.” – The Love of Wisdom, Steven B. Cowan and James S. Spiegel, p. 329.
Most of us would agree, however, that these events did morally progress America. Meaning
that their institutions improved the moral state of our nation.
Now advocates of same-sex marriage claim the same thing, but
have removed the objective moral foundation on which those events were based
on. The moral state of our nation is no longer based on anything; it is based
on itself. And something that is based on itself is about as solid as air.
What was that moral foundation, then? God’s. The Holy Bible. It is what all moral claims are built on.
Why? Because the moral foundation was poured by someone who is morally perfect.
Homosexuality is wrong (1 Corinthians 6:9-11, Romans
1:25-28, 1 Corinthians 7:2). God hates it because it is in direct conflict with
the way we are created and designed. It is not what is best for us. It is
something that is done based on the volatile passions of the flesh. In other
words, what feels right.
This is true whether one accepts the reality of God’s creating
humanity or not. Biology, anatomy, and evolution itself are in opposition to
homosexuality. There is no survival, the chief end of evolution, for the
homosexual because the homosexual would run himself into extinction.
This is a moral issue because moral are real and have a real
basis. A worldly government will never be perfect, but the Bible does say that
it is in the hands of God (Romans 13:1-7). Therefore we should pray for our countries
always, always, always (1 Timothy 2:1-3,
1 Peter 2:13-17).
Beyond this, however, I encourage Christians to remember
that homosexuality is an issue, but it is no more wrong than any sexual sin, or
any sin at all that Christian’s and non-Christians alike have committed.
All sins are equal in God’s eyes.
But the glorious thing is that God sent His Son and has already
paid for everyone’s sins whether they accept Him or not. The goal of our
life as Christians is not to judge those outside of the church (see 1
Corinthians 5:12-13), but to direct those people into a relationship with God
so that they may experience His
grace (not ours), love, and abundant relationship with Him. Do you not think we
can trust him to bring the lives of
His children into alignment with His word?
But that follows, as we all know, after the relationship has been initiated.
So do not hate your fellow man, who has been uniquely
created for a purpose and is loved by God yet hunted by the Enemy.
And pray for your nation and its leaders. Pray that God’s
will would be accomplished in the Supreme Court’s decision. It may not look
like what we expect it to, but never forget that you can trust Him even when
this picture is bleak.
Miss Ryleigh